Voltaire would have puked. These days a narrative is developed and no matter what the reality is, the narrative remains. The Mittster created jobs alright, perhaps not 100,000, and perhaps lots of misery was caused as divisions were spun off and companies bled dry until they went bankrupt. But he did create jobs. Unfortunately for those who bother to analyze just a teeny weeny bit it’s just not the creation of jobs but of what type. At Staples and Domino’s and Sports Authority you have a whole bunch of low paying retail clerk positions, about at minimum wage. Sure, there are some management positions but those are rare.
This is the thing about minimum wage – it sucks and you can’t live on it unless… you room with others, or stay with your parents, or don’t have a car, or get food stamps, or use community resources all the time – find books at the library, shop at the 99 cents store, obtain medical care at the community clinics, or a combination of the aforementioned. I’m not saying any of the previous is bad, but it certainly isn’t easy and there is no cushion for any accidents or emergencies that can put you right out onto the street.
Romney probably thinks he’s a job creator. That’s the thing; there is so little self awareness out there. People can talk themselves into anything. Like breaking a company so that you can squeeze out a few extra million for yourself. I’m not talking about the negative aspects of such a thing, I’m not even talking

stock.xchng.com
about the Ben and Jerry’s experiment (which has ended) of the no more than 7 to 1 ratio between the highest and lowest paid employees. What I’m writing today about is the need for self-awareness. An honest Romney pitch would be – “I made oodles of money and I was good at it. I believe my capabilities as a Governor, and head of the Olympics and earning money show that I can lead and that I have leadership abilities. Though I have never led anything on the grand scale of the U.S. government, I believe I have the talent to do so.” Of course, the Mittster will never say such a thing. It’s far too honest.*
Politics, like business is full of bullshit representations. Suddenly, austerity is a key word for tea-baggers, right-wingers, Republicans, and everyone buying into their talking points. And supposedly many of the aforementioned believe that someone who has earned a large profit for themselves and their class of owners can run an austerity campaign. Even if you were to take austerity seriously as a way to stimulate an economy (it’s not) how you could think that Romney, or someone like Carly Fiorina, could run a government when the way they deal with problems is to cut jobs and outsource? Another of the right’s heroines is Meg Whitman who as the new leader of Hewlett Packard, is cutting about 8% of the workforce, composed almost all of U.S. workers. At the same time she is maintaining or increasing outsourcing. How does that prepare one to run an economy?
College courses in accounting and economics are broken down between private and public sectors. It’s true that public accounting jobs, especially after generations without proper review, tend to lead to get

stock.xchng.com
sloppy and wasteful – but that is true of just about anything. Of course a goal should be to minimize waste. The right fails to see that there are two sides to this. Those in the private sector also have to understand that the means for making a profit do not necessarily work for a whole economy. If waste has an ancillary benefit of creating more jobs than it costs, it is not necessarily bad thing. The components and result of the waste must be analyzed. To really comprehend this the scope can’t be narrow; you have to see the whole. And be self-aware.
*Though I’m singling out Romney for the sake of the argument, the problem is wide-spread.